Naming Your Web Product

by mikepk on December 7, 2009

name_tag2.pngWhen I’m developing something new, I always have a terrible time coming up with a name I really like. I spend way too much time obsessing over it. Web products have the additional burden of having to have an available domain to use. I’ve written before how we obsess over these things, but that I don’t think that names are a first order effect on the success potential of a startup. Still, I can’t help it. There’s some intrinsic attraction to the creative power of naming something wholly new.

While at boston startup weekend, it reminded me that I’m not the only one who has this obsession when creating new products. I decided to share some of the tools I’ve found useful in coming up with names, as well as a bit of workflow.

Usually I’ll come up with a few concept words that I think are representative of the product or idea. A good first resource is just using a thesaurus like thesaurus.com, to see if there are other related words to the first key words that might better embody the project idea (or maybe words that have a better sound).

Then I’ll usually use a few word / domain mashing sites to see if any combination of those words make suitable domain names that are available. I use Nameboy and Suggestly. These tools are useful because they automatically mash words together with other common domain words and simultaneously check domain availability.

The next step I usually do is to find rhyming words based on my keywords. Sometimes rhyming combinations can be compelling (think StubHub). Finding rhyming combinations that work is pretty tough, but it’s worth checking. I use a site called Rhymezone to check for rhyming patterns.

The last step I usually try is to take root, prefix, and suffix words that give the ‘feel’ for the product and use Wordoid to come up with “english-like” words that incorporate pieces of the words. Wordoid is, again, very useful because it checks the domain availability of the invented words as it generates them.

Another tool that I occasionally use, especially if I’m stuck, is Chris Pirillo’s Domain suggestion engine. The site takes a URL to any page and randomly mashes words from the page’s text together and checks the domain availability. It seems like it’s a bit of a side project and doesn’t always work, but it’s useful because it can act almost like random brainstorming. I’ve found it sometimes sparks me to think in ways I wasn’t thinking before. It can highlight words you might not have thought of, especially if you point the tool to a site that incorporates a lot of the concepts that are specific to your product.

This isn’t exactly a linear workflow. Each step usually sparks ideas that can be tried at the different points. Overall, it’s kind of like an internet assisted brainstorming session. Hopefully you’ll find these tools useful in naming your own web product. Don’t obsess too much though, there’s a lot of work to be done. :)

{ 8 comments }

The Fall of The Benevolent Google

by mikepk on December 4, 2009

logo.gif Louis Gray has a post where he declares that Google will never be “evil”. I found it very interesting for a few reasons. Why does Google seem so benevolent? Why do so many people implicitly trust them? As Louis highlights, part of it is the corporate culture they’ve built. I think, however, there is a more concrete reason, one that is not guaranteed no matter how much you want to like the company.

How many of Google endeavors really generate revenue? In my mind, there is only one reason why they are able to embark on so many projects that seem to place the users best interests first, because the whole company is subsidized by the real Google, the advertising company.

Google has the luxury of being highly profitable, which allows it to branch out in many non-traditional ways.

Asked what a business is, the typical business man is likely to answer, “An organization to make profit”. The typical economist is likely to give the same answer. The answer is not only false, it is irrelevant.

The prevailing economic theory of the mission of business enterprise and behavior, the maximization of profit [...] cannot explain how Sears, Roebuck or any other business operates, or how it should operate. The concept of profit maximization is, in fact, meaningless. The danger in the concept of profit maximization is that it makes profitability appear a myth.

Profit and profitability are, however, crucial – for society even more than for the individual business. Yet profitability is not the purpose of, but the limiting factor on business enterprise and business activity…
– “The Essential Drucker”, Peter Drucker
emphasis mine

Sure, you can argue that most of their projects to improve the web users experience ultimately benefit their ad business, but that kind of thinking is only tolerated when a company is highly profitable and experiencing significant growth. The only thing that needs to happen for Google to start acting “Evil” is for ad profits to decline and/or company growth to start missing Wall Street expectations.

54132892_7efdaf2347_t.jpgYou would immediately see projects that could only loosely be justified start to get canceled. Anything not generating direct profits would be scrutinized. If the ad business were to become really threatened, you would begin to see Google tapping a lot more of the value it has stored up in the power it has accumulated.

As long as things are going well, the decisions to create these projects, and the way they’re handled in “non-Evil” ways won’t be questioned. The moment that profitability comes into question, there will be a natural pressure to exploit Google’s power position. If the management, employees, and engineers are unwilling to exploit the advantages they’ve accumulated, it is highly likely they will be replaced by ones who will (implicitly by the shareholders).

For those that think Google can never be Evil, I hope they’re right. I hope Google always generates enough profits to place users, and user experience, first. I don’t think it can last forever. Their advertising cash-cow will being to dry up at some point. That will likely be the end of the benevolent Google. It is, after all, still a corporation whose business activities are limited by profitability.


{ 8 comments }

Munich

December 2, 2009

A series of pictures that I took with my iphone in Munich.

Read →

Plum Island

December 2, 2009

Some pictures we took when we were on Plum Island a few months ago. Testing some mediaRSS modifications.

Read →

Update: SnapMyInfo

December 1, 2009

It’s been about two months since I opened up SnapMyInfo for testing, thank you to all those who have given the site a try! I thought I would write a quick post with an update on the project.
First, a thank you to Marshall Kirkpatrick for mentioning the project over on his posterous blog. That [...]

Read →

An Interesting Video from the Web 2.0 Expo on Currency

November 23, 2009

Some pretty thought provoking ideas about currency and its implications regarding creativity, abundance, and the digital world. Not sure if I agree with all of it, but still interesting.
Web 2.0 Expo NY 09: Douglas Rushkoff, “Radical Abundance: How We Get Past “Free”

Found via FriendFeed user “Complex Days”

Read →

Chrome OS and The Luxury of Time

November 20, 2009

Chrome is going to be a major hit! Or err… maybe it’s going to be a huge flop. We have no idea.
In the throes of building my second startup, I’m acutely aware of one thing: time. Google doesn’t need to have a runaway success with ChromeOS (or Android for that matter) right out of the [...]

Read →

Beyond The Long Game

October 30, 2009

I just read a pretty stunning analysis over on, abovethecorwd.com (Bill Gurley’s blog, a VC with Benchmark Capital): Google Redefines Disruption.
I underestimated Google’s price/cost strategy, in my previous post. I thought they were going to allow market forces and free (both as in beer and speech) to bring cost of handsets to near zero [...]

Read →

The Long Game

October 26, 2009

The coverage of the mobile space for the past several years has been entertaining to watch, especially where pundits declared devices from various manufacturers as sure-fire iPhone ‘killers’ (the wishy-washy ones appending a question mark to the phrase). Initially the focus was on spec sheets and touchscreens, the thinking seemed to be that a touchscreen [...]

Read →

Help Me Test SnapMyInfo!

October 7, 2009

I’m now actively seeking testers for SnapMyInfo! Check it out and let me know what you think!

What is it?
SnapMyInfo is my particular solution to a problem I invariably have: I always manage to forget my business cards. Always.
I wanted some kind of system where I could rapidly share my contact information with someone else, [...]

Read →